2012 AAAS
Engineering Section Meeting
Friday February 17, 2012
Pan Pacific Hotel, Oveanview
Suite 2
MINUTES
1. Introductions: Vince Poor, Section Chair, called the meeting to
order at 9:15 AM. He asked those present
to introduce themselves. The attendance list is included in Appendix A.
Before getting into the agenda items, William Press,
AAAS President-Elect and Chair of the Program Committee for the 2013 AAAS
Annual Meeting, which will be held in Boston, MA, February 14-18, 2013, joined
our business meeting for a brief period.
He described some new initiatives for reviewing symposia proposals;
namely a new process by which the officers of each AAAS section will be asked
to rank order all submitted proposals that have indicated a relation between
the proposal topic and a specific AAAS section.
He then described the theme of the 2013 Annual Meeting: The Beauty and
Benefits of Science. He pointed out that this theme points to the unreasonable
effectiveness of the scientific enterprise in creating economic growth, solving
societal problems, and satisfying the essential human drive to understand the
world in which we live. He encouraged our section to submit symposia proposals
for the meeting. The deadline for submission is Thursday April 26, 2013,
11:59pm, PT. The submission website is www.aaas.org/meetings. Decisions will
be announced in late June. Before
leaving, Dr. Press answered several questions from the attendees largely
focused on the efforts of AAAS in attracting young scientists and engineers in
joining the association.
2. Approval
of Minutes: Dr. Poor asked for comments and possible changes to the draft
minutes of the Section Business Meeting held on February 18, 2011, at the
Washington, DC meeting. The draft minutes were posted on the Section website http://www.eecs.ucf.edu/aaas-m
shortly after the 2011 Washington, DC, meeting.
Copies of the draft minutes were also distributed at the meeting. There were no comments made or changes
suggested. A motion was made and
seconded to approve the minutes. The motion
passed unanimously.
3. Announcements: Dr. Poor announced that Kristina M. Johnson
(Enduring Energy, LLC) has been elected Chair-Elect and Alan Willner
(University of Southern California) has been elected Member-at-Large of the
Engineering Section’s Steering Group both effective February 21, 2012. He also announced that Linda P. B. Katehi (University of California, Davis) and Gregory
Stephanopoulos (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) have been elected to the
Engineering Section Electorate Nominating Committee; and Stuart L. Cooper (Ohio
State University) and Larry V. McIntire (Georgia Tech/Emory University) have
been elected as Council Delegates representing our section on Council. Dr. Poor thanked all the officers whose terms
ended after this Annual Meeting: Duncan T. Moore as Retiring Chair, Cristina Amon as Retiring Member-at-Large, Kristen Fichthorn and Pradeep K. Khosla
as Retiring Members of the Electorate Nominating Committee; and Gail H. Marcus
and James L. Merz as Retiring Council Delegates. On February 21, 2012 Dr. Poor will become the
Retiring Chair and in that capacity he will serve on the AAAS Council and he
will also Chair the Electorate Nominating Committee.
A list of the names of the new Engineering Section
Fellows was distributed at the meeting and is attached as Appendix B. The Newly elected Fellows were invited to
attend our business meeting and 20 of the 53 were able to attend. Dr. Poor welcomed them, and thanked them for
attending the meeting. He then asked each of them to briefly describe their
affiliations and research interests.
4. Fellow
Nomination Process: Dr. Poor asked Marwan Simaan, the section secretary to
review the AAAS Fellow nomination process which is the same as in previous
years. Dr. Simaan mentioned that our
section currently has 6,361 Members including 902 Fellows who are affiliated
with our section, and of these 3,213 Members and 514 Fellows have chosen
Engineering as their primary section. This year 53 members of our section were
elected as Fellows of AAAS out of a total of 539 newly elected Fellows for the
entire AAAS.
Dr. Simaan then described the Fellow nomination
process. There are three ways a AAAS member can be nominated:
1)
By a member of
the Steering Group (method 1),
2)
By a group of
three Fellows (method 2), and
3)
By the AAAS Chief
Executive Officer (method 3).
For Fellow nominations by members of the Steering
Group (method 1), he mentioned that this method is subject to a quota of no
more than 0.4% of the section membership, which is equal to 13 for this
year. Information on the nomination
process by a group of three Fellows (method 2) and a copy of the nomination
form can be found on the AAAS main website.
A link to that website can also be found on our section Website (http://www.eecs.ucf.edu/aaas-m). Dr. Simaan also mentioned that the deadline
for Fellow nominations by a group of three Fellows is April 11, 2012, and that
there is no quota for those elected through nominations by the three Fellows
method. By May 16, 2012, all members of
the Steering Group will receive from the AAAS Executive Office copies of the
nomination materials for all nominees by the section and a voting sheet that
they will need to complete and return to him by June 15, 2012. Marwan will then forward all votes to the
Executive Office. He concluded by saying
that in all three methods, a successful candidate must receive no less than
five yes votes and no more than two no votes.
At the end, the ideas were grouped into ten important
topics that would encompass many symposia that could be planned and sponsored
by our section. A summary of these
topics is given below.
1. Proposed
Title: Worldwide Progress toward
Fusion Energy
Organizers: John Lindl (LLNL) lindl1@llnl.gov (925) 422-5430; Miklos Porkolab (MIT) porkolab@psfc.mit.edu (617) 253-8448;
Ned Sauthoff (ORNL) sauthoffnr@ornl.gov (865) 574-5955
Proposed
Length: 180 minutes
Description: We are headed for a turning point in the path to
fusion energy. In the two complementary approaches to fusion -
magnetic fusion energy and inertial fusion energy - we are entering new
experimental regimes. Construction has begun on ITER, the
international magnetic fusion experiment in France that is projected to
generate 500 million watts of fusion power, using 50MW external heating power in a nearly self-sustaining
plasma. The National Ignition Facility (NIF), the
inertial confinement fusion experiment at Lawrence Livermore National
Laboratory, is approaching ignition, the condition in which a self-sustaining
fusion burn wave propagates in the laser-imploded pellet, generating more
fusion energy than laser energy used to drive the implosion. Both of
these upcoming milestones build upon huge advances over the past decade in the
physics and engineering of fusion systems. Actions in addition to ITER
and NIF that are necessary to resolve the remaining challenges have been
identified and integrated into roadmaps to deliver commercial fusion energy.
Proposed
Speakers:
1. ITER: A Magnetically-Confined
Burning Plasma;
Richard
Hawryluk (Deputy Director General of ITER)
2. NIF Program
and Ignition Campaign
Dr. John Lindl (Chief Scientist for NIF & Photon Science
Directorate, LLNL)
3. Physics and
Technology Accomplishments In Magnetic-Confinement
Fusion
Professor Steve Cowley (CEO, UKAEA/Culham,
Head of EURATOM/CCFE
Fusion Association) or Dr. Martin Greenwald (Associate Director, Plasma Science
& Fusion Center, MIT)
4. Alternate Approaches/Direct Drive in
Inertial-Confinement Fusion
Dr. Robert McCrory
(Director, Laboratory for Laser Energetics, Vice Provost, CEO, and Sr.
Scientist, U Rochester Laboratory for Laser Energetics)
5. Issues and Paths to Magnetic-Confinement Fusion
Energy
Dr. G. H. Neilson (Deputy Dept. Head,
ITER & Tokamaks, Princeton Plasma Physics Lab)
6. Issues and Paths to Inertial-Confinement Fusion
Energy
Professor Michael Dunne (Director for
Laser Fusion Energy, LLNL)
2. Proposed Title: Cyber-physical
Social Systems: Towards Smart Health Care
Organizers: Organizers: Ram Sriram,
NIST, ram.sriram@nist.gov and Vint Cerf, Google,
vint@google.com
Proposed
Length: 180 minutes
Description: We are
witnessing a new revolution in computing and communication. The Internet, which has spanned several
networks in a wide variety of domains, is having a significant impact on every
aspect of our lives. The next generation of networks will utilize a wide
variety of resources with significant sensing capabilities. Such networks will
extend beyond physically linked computers to include multimodal information
from biological, cognitive, semantic, and social networks. This paradigm shift will involve symbiotic
networks of people (social networks), intelligent devices, and mobile personal
computing and communication devices (mPCDs), that
will form net-centric societies or
cyber-physical social systems. mPCDs
are already equipped with myriad sensors, with regular updates of additional
sensing capabilities. Additionally, we are witnessing the emergence of
“intelligent devices,” such as smart meters, smart cars, etc., with
considerable sensing and networking capabilities. Hence, these devices – and
the network -- will be constantly sensing, monitoring, and interpreting the
environment; this is sometimes referred to as the Internet of Things (IOT).
The symbiosis of IOT and social networks will have significant
implications for both the market for advanced computing and communication
infrastructure and the future markets – for nearly 4.5 billion people -- that
net-centric societies will create.
Well-designed and constructed net-centric societies
will result in better quality of life, reduced threat from external sources,
and improved commerce. For example, assume a scenario where people at various
locations suffer from flu-like symptoms. In a net-centric society, mPCDs will send vital signs and other associated
information to appropriate laboratories and medical centers. These centers will
analyze the information, including searching the Internet for potential
solutions, and will aid in determining possible causes for this phenomenon.
Based on the diagnosis, people will be directed to the nearest clinic for
treatment. Here we have several types of information flowing through the net:
data from mPCDs; location information; images; video;
audio; etc.
This joint symposium between Sections M (Engineering)
and T (Information, Computing and Communication) will discuss examples of
cyber-physical societies in the health care domain.
Potential speakers will include:
Prof. Ramesh Jain, University of California, Irvine
Dr. Koji Zettsu/Kyoung-sook Kim, MICT, Japan
Fred Hosea, Kaiser Permanente
Speaker 4, MIT Media Lab
Speaker 5, TBA
Speaker 6, TBA
3. Proposed Title: Water monitoring and purification under
minimal resource setting
Organizers: Sushanta Mitra and Thomas Thundat, Univ of Alberta, sushanta.mitra@ualberta.ca
Proposed Length: 90 minutes
Description: The symposium will focus on low-cost
engineering solutions for water cleaning and monitoring challenges, particularly
relevant to developing world and Northern communities in Canada. The proposed
symposium will bring together leading scientist and technologists in water
management, end users like government bodies and municipalities and also social
scientists who will look at the implications of
deployment of water monitoring technologies in the community level.
4. Proposed
Title: Flatland Revisited – The
Beauty of Edwin Abbott’s “Romance”
Organizer: James Merz, University of
Notre Dame
Proposed Length: 180 Minutes
Description: In 1884 Edwin A. Abbott, a theologian with
mathematical propensity, published the novella “Flatland – A Romance of Many
Dimensions, with Illustrations by the Author,
A SQUARE.” In this
charming tale the hero, a perfect square living in a two-dimensional world,
stumbles across worlds of even lower dimension: Lineland
and Dotland, and eventually the most incomprehensible
of all, the three-dimensional world of Spaceland.
In recent decades,
Abbott’s romance has been realized by physicists, chemists, materials
scientists, and microscopy engineers, who have succeeded in fabricating and
investigating the extraordinary properties of low-dimensional structures at the
nanoscale. At a time when the integrated circuit
industry is struggling to shrink circuits to nanometer size and introduce new
paradigms of computing in order to continue the extrapolation of circuit
complexity and computing power predicted by Gordon Moore, many scientists and
engineers are considering Richard Feynman’s observation that “There is room at
the bottom.” Researchers are attempting to make structures from the bottom up,
by assembling devices and circuits atom by atom, rather than carving them into
ever smaller structures. Many interesting results have already been realized,
but this symposium focuses instead on the inherent beauty of the unexpected
physical properties of the structures that are being pursued. Quantum wells,
wires, and dots are being fabricated by a variety of techniques, and their
often-unexpected properties disclosed. Leaders in this field will describe the
richness of the results that have been realized.
Possible speakers and
my attempt at providing them with titles (none of these people have been
contacted as yet):
1. Herbert Kroemer,
Nobel Laureate 2000: “Heterostructures
for Everything, Engineered for Novel Physical Properties.”
2. Hiroyuki Sakaki, NEC Computer and Communications Foundation Prize,
2010: “Quantum Wire Transistors and Quantum Dot Lasers.”
3. Horst Stormer, Nobel Laureate 1998: “Fractional Quantum Hall
Effect for Dummies.”
4. George Whitesides, National Medal of Science 1998, Kyoto
Prize 2003: “Diagnostics for All – the One-Cent Solution.”
5. Pierre Petroff,
ISCS Quantum Devices Award 2005: “From Atoms into Self-Organized Dots.”
6. Alexander Mintairov, Research Professor, University of Notre Dame and
former Research Member, Ioffe Institute St.
Petersburg: “The Curious Behavior of Wigner Molecules.”
5.
Proposed Title: Science
on the Hollywood Screen
Organizers: Dr. Donna Nelson, University of Oklahoma,
djnelson@ou.edu, and Dr. Bruce Lewenstein, Cornell
Proposed Length: 90 minutes
Description: Contributions from advisers to and writers of and about TV shows and movies with science content. Speakers will be experts with connections to “moving media” (television and movies) and most would have experience as producers, writers, and science advisers. Each will present his/her work which makes science appealing to the general public. Particular emphasis will be on chemistry.
6. Proposed
Title: Convergence of Physical Sciences,
Engineering, and Life Science:
Transforming the Next Innovation
Proposed
Length: 180 minutes
Organizer: Larry Nagahara (National Cancer Institute/National Institutes of
Health; larry.nagahara@nih.gov)
Description: Investment in both basic and applied research has
transformed many of innovations in the 20th century. For instance, the semiconductor and
telecommunication revolution has roots in basic discovery (beauty), which
transformed the way we ‘process’ our daily lives and drove a remarkable
economic growth worldwide (benefit).
These breakthroughs grew out of the convergence between discoveries in
the physical sciences and engineering.
New (perhaps grander) opportunities are emerging at the convergence of
the physical sciences and engineering with the life sciences. This convergence
has been reported in various National Academies reports, including A New
Biology for the 21st Century and Research at the Intersection of the Physical
and Life Sciences, noted editorials, “The Next Innovation Revolution” [Science 323, 1147 (2009)], and national funded
programs such as the National Cancer Institute’s (NCI’s) Physical
Sciences-Oncology Centers program. The
convergence of these fields can spawn new discoveries and applications in areas
well beyond biomedicine. However in
order to successfully nurture and accelerate these next innovations,
incorporating multiple perspective, innovative approaches in the education of
students and young investigators, as well as changing evaluation and funding
opportunities in interdisciplinary team science will be needed. This symposium will highlight some of the
emerging opportunities to address major questions and barriers in biomedical
research and challenges facing the convergence of these fields.
Proposed
Speakers:
1)
Phillip
Sharp (MIT – Nobel Prize 1993)
2)
Tyler
Jacks (MIT – Director, The Koch Institute for Integrative Cancer Research)
3)
Roger
Tsien (UCSD – Nobel Prize 2009)
4)
Alexander
van Oudenaarden (MIT)
5)
Franziska Michor (Dana Farber)
6)
Chad
Mirkin (Northwestern University)
7)
Jim
Heath (Cal Tech)
8)
Peter
Kuhn (Scripps Institute)
7.
Proposed Title:
Engineering Solutions for Future Diagnostics and Therapeutics
Organizers: Ali Adibi,
Georgia Institute of Technology; adibi@ece.gatech.edu, and Richard C. Willson, University of Houston, willson@uh.edu
Proposed
Length: 180 minutes
Description: This symposium will focus on novel engineering solutions to enable new dimensions in diagnostics and therapeutics. By employing nano science and engineering, efficient detection of multiple biomarkers in a very short time with low cost is becoming a reality. The availability of such information over a long period of time will be an asset for monitoring the health condition of healthy people, predicting potential problems before they occur (i.e., predictive medicine), detecting serious health problems (e.g., cancer) at early stages, and monitoring the dynamics of recovery and the effectiveness of therapy. In addition, the possibility of low-cost monitoring of multiple blood biomarkers over a long period of time will enable new research in medicine for studying the role of these biomarkers and their relative concentrations in different health issues. Future extension of such capabilities to in vivo monitoring of blood biomarkers and the study of their role in different health conditions will change the path of medical care towards "personalized medicine". In addition to the advanced detection technologies for health monitoring and diagnostics, new advances in drug development and in vivo drug delivery have created breakthroughs in therapeutics. The use of microelectromechanical systems (MEMS) for such applications has emerged in the last decade. The use of these novel engineering approaches for addressing the needs of diagnostics and therapeutics in the foreseen future will be discussed in this symposium. This 180-minute symposium will include 6-7 talks with different lengths Between 15 and 25 minutes each. The speakers will be selected from 4 different subgroups of academic engineers (who will talk about the new solutions), clinicians (who will talk about the futures needs from the medical prospective), top healthcare industries, and policy makers/funding agencies (e.g., DARPA and NIH). The talk shall take a total of 120 minutes followed by a 60 minute panel discussion.
Selected Potential Speakers (each of whom
we have a reasonable prospect of landing through prior contacts):
1.
George
Whitesides, Harvard. World respected chemist,
increasingly involved in diagnostics through Diagnostics For
All.
2.
David
Walt, Tufts. Founder of Illumina
and Quanterix.
3.
Anthony
J. Sinskey, MIT. Director, MIT Center for Biomedical
Innovation
4.
K.
Dane Wittrup, MIT. Leading developer of therapeutic
antibodies, and founder of Adimab
5.
Robert
Langer, MIT. The most-cited engineer in Earth, prolific developer of biomedical
technologies and translational companies.
8. Proposed
Title: Control Engineering of Brain in Health and
Disease
Organizers: Alok Sinha, Professor of
Mechanical Engineering, PSU (AAAS, Engineering); Steven J. Schiff, Professor of
Neurosurgery, PSU, (AAAS, Medical Sciences); Mauricio Terrones,
Professor of Physics, PSU (AAAS, Physics)
Proposed
Length: 180 Minutes
Description: Brain is a highly complex dynamical system. Can we
utilize control system theory to observe and understand the brain’s activity?
Can we control the brain’s dynamics, in particular, to treat neural diseases such as
Parkinson’s disease, epilepsy and migraines? There are currently many
activities towards these lofty goals. In complex networks, we are now gaining
an understanding of the controllability that is possible. Optimal and robust
strategies emerge in our decision making. Our ability to control smart prosthetics
and robotics from brain signals is making rapid progress. There are
mathematical models for Parkinson’s disease, which have given us new insight
into the mechanism of this debilitating condition, as well as guiding us to
more optimal methods of electrically controlling the symptoms of the disease.
The emerging advances from the transdisciplinary
intersection of control engineering, dynamical physics,,
and medicine, is one of broad impact.
Potential speakers are
Eric Shea-Brown , Vision,
(Math, Decision Making), University of Washington
Jonathan Rubin, (Math, Parkinson’s
Disease), University of Pittsburgh
Jeff Ojemann, (Engineering
and Medical Sciences, Brain Machine Interfaces), University of Washington
Laslo Barabasi, (Network
Physics), Northeastern University
S.J.Schiff (Engineering, Physics and Medical Sciences), Penn.
State University
9.
Proposed Title:
Engineering Behind the Beauty of a Flower: Clues for Energy-Efficient Human-Built Environment
Organizer: Lakshmi Reddi, Florida International University, lreddi@fiu.edu
Proposed Length: 90 minutes
Description: This symposium will address the scientific and engineering
processes manifested in a flower, particularly of the hydrodynamic nature, and
examines the thermoregulatory processes that could be mimicked in human-built
environment.
At the scale of an individual plant system, plant physiologists have
excelled in understanding the ‘engineering’ behind the processes of water
transport through plants. About 99% of water absorbed through plant roots is
transpired through an intricate network of pores in plant leaves and flowers
allowing these leaves and flowers to thermoregulate
themselves. The engineering mechanisms operating through opening and closing of
the stomata (minute pores in the epidermis of the leaf or the stem of the
plant) to cool the leaf systems, are well understood. The environmental
cues affecting stomata opening and closing, viz., light, water, temperature, and CO2, contribute to the
auto-thermoregulatory nature of plant leaves. The intricate mechanisms
involved in the flow of water through xylem (vascular tissue in plants
conducting water upward from the roots), in response to demand from leaf
transpiration, in spite of the presence of possible air-locks (‘cavitation’)
could be regarded as a highly evolved form of nature’s engineering. The
evolution of a waxy, hydrophobic layer (cuticle) on the leaf controls the
transpiration rate from the leaves, which in turn modifies the flow
requirements from the roots and the xylem.
This symposium will bring together experts from botany, structural
and construction engineering, and biomimetics, to
explore the relevance of nature's engineering behind the beauty of flowers in
the context of building energy-efficient structures.
10.
Proposed Title: Urban
Habitat: Applying Science and Engineering to Improve the Quality of Life
Organizer: John L. Anderson (Section M), Illinois
Institute of Technology; johna@iit.edu
Proposed
Length: 90 minutes
Description: A few years ago the world hit a tipping
point when more than half of the population was living in an urban environment.
As that fraction grows, challenges must be overcome to provide energy, water
and food to the urban habitat and provide an aesthetically pleasing,
sustainable environment. There has been a revolution in technology associated
with designing and building high-rise residential and office structures, based
on scientific and engineering principles and recognizing the importance of
quality of life. This symposium deals with advances in concepts and technology
- such as zero net energy buildings, vertical farming, transportation in
congested urban environments, and new materials - to achieve goals of both form
and function with least disturbance to the environment.
Potential Speaker:
1. William F. Baker, Partner in Skidmore,
Owings and Merrill LLP (Structural Engineer, NAE member) – structural design of
tall buildings
2. Roger E Frechette
III, President of PositivEnergy Practice LLC
(Structural Engineer) – building design for zero net energy consumption
3. Adrian Smith,
formerly of SOM (Architect) – design of tall buildings.
4. Dietmar Rempfer, Mechanical Engineering
at Illinois Institute of Technology – computational fluid dynamics of wind flow
around tall buildings
5. Antony Wood, Executive Director, Center
for Tall Buildings and Urban Habitat (Architect) – technical and human
challenges
6. Ken Yeang,
eco design of buildings (Architect) - vertical farms in highrise
buildings
7. Dickson Despommier,
Environmental Health and Sciences at Columbia University (Scientist) – coined
the term “vertical farming”
8. Speaker on transportation in urban environments
Dr. Poor encouraged all those who have suggested these
ideas to develop them further and submit them on the AAAS proposal submission
website by the deadline of April 26, 2012.
Finally,
Dr. Poor asked for suggestions for Plenary and Topical lectures speakers. Below are some of the names that were
suggested.
Jeffrey R. Immelt, Chairman
of GE
John E. Kelly III, Senior
Vice President and Director of IBM Research.
Charles M. Vest, President of the National
Academy of Engineering
Robert J. Birgeneau, Chancellor
of the University of California, Berkeley
Bernard Amadei:
Founder of Engineers Without Borders
6. Adjournment: The meeting was
adjourned at 12:00PM. Lunch was served.
Submitted by:
Marwan A. Simaan
Section Secretary
February 21, 2012
Appendix A
Attendance
List
1. H. Vincent Poor, Elect
2. John L. Anderson, Chair-Elect
3. Marwan Simaan, Secretary
4. Cristina Amon, Member at
Large
5. Gail Marcus, Council Delegate
6. James Merz, Council Delegate
7.
Ali
Adibi, Newly Elected Fellow
8.
Pedro
J.J. Alvarez, Newly Elected Fellow
9.
Panos
Antsaklis, Newly Elected Fellow
10. Terry Bahill,
Newly Elected Fellow
11. Robert J. Butera,
Newly Elected Fellow
12. Barry Carter, Newly Elected
Fellow
13. Ni-Bin Chang, Newly Elected
Fellow
14. Suzanne Fortier, Newly Elected
Fellow
15. Suresh V. Garimella,
Newly Elected Fellow
16. Yogi D. Goswami,
Newly Elected Fellow
17. K. Jimmy Hsia, Newly Elected
Fellow
18. Antonios G. Mikos,
Newly Elected Fellow
19. Larry Akio Nagahara,
Newly Elected Fellow
20. Lakshmi N. Reddi, Newly Elected
Fellow
21. William B. Russel,
Newly Elected Fellow
22. Vijay Srinivasan,
Newly Elected Fellow
23. Paul G. Steffes,
Newly Elected Fellow
24. Moe Z. Win, Newly Elected Fellow
25. Hussein M. Zbib,
Newly Elected Fellow
26. Mengchu Zhou, Newly Elected Fellow
27. Sankar Basu
28. Moe Khaleel
29. Sushanta Mitra
30. Donna Nelson
31. Miklos Porkolab
32. Carolyn Sealfon
33. Alok Sinha
34. Ram D. Sriram
35. Richard Willson
36. Fen Zhao
Appendix B
New
AAAS Fellows elected in December 2011
Newly elected Fellows affiliated with section M (Engineering) are:
·
Ali Adibi, Georgia Institute of Technology
·
Suresh K. Aggarwal, University of Illinois at Chicago
·
Muhammad A. Alam, Purdue University
·
Pedro J.J. Alvarez, Rice University
·
Panos Antsaklis, University of Notre Dame
·
Terry Bahill, University of Arizona
·
Rashid Bashir, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
·
Wesley R. Burghardt, Northwestern University
·
Robert J. Butera, Georgia Institute of Technology
·
Barry Carter, University of Connecticut
·
Sanjeev
Chandra, University of Toronto, Canada
·
Srinivasan
Chandrasekar,
Purdue University
·
Ni-Bin Chang, University of Central Florida
·
Rama Chellappa, University of Maryland, College Park
·
Vikram L. Dalal, Iowa State University
·
Pablo G. Debenedetti, Princeton University
·
Debasish
Dutta,
University of Illinois at
Urbana-Champaign
·
Suzanne Fortier, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
·
Benny Dean Freeman, University of Texas at Austin
·
Suresh V. Garimella, Purdue University
·
Andrew Avi
Goldenberg, University of Toronto, Canada
·
Yogi D. Goswami, University of South Florida:
·
Rajiv Gupta, University of California, Riverside
·
Joseph P. Heremans, Ohio State University
·
K. Jimmy Hsia, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
·
Yingbo
Hua,
University of California, Riverside
·
Michael M. Khonsari, Louisiana State University
·
Lee Rybeck
Lynd, Dartmouth College
·
Antonios
G. Mikos, Rice University:
·
Larry Akio Nagahara, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health
·
Chul
Park, University of Toronto, Canada
·
Bhakta
B. Rath,
Naval Research Laboratory
·
Lakshmi N. Reddi, Florida International University
·
William B. Russel, Princeton University
·
Michael Vivian Sefton,
University of Toronto, Canada
·
Michael L. Simpson, Oak Ridge National Laboratory
·
Tarunraj
Singh, University at Buffalo, The State University
of New York
·
Alexander J. Smits, Princeton University
·
Randall Q. Snurr, Northwestern University
·
Vijay Srinivasan, National Institute of Standards and Technology
·
Paul G. Steffes, Georgia Institute of Technology
·
Michael Tsapatsis, University of Minnesota
·
Darrell Velegol, Pennsylvania State University
·
Richard E. Waugh, University of Rochester
·
Alan E. Willner, University of Southern California
·
Moe Z. Win, Massachusetts Institute of Technology
·
Karl Dane Wittrup, Massachusetts Institute of Technology
·
William W-G. Yeh, University of California, Los Angeles
·
R. Paul Young, University of Toronto, Canada
·
Paul K.L. Yu, University of California, San Diego
·
Hussein M. Zbib, Washington State University
·
Kemin
Zhou, Louisiana State University
·
Mengchu
Zhou, New Jersey Institute of Technology